<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP and AMD Opteron: bed fellows at last</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sniptools.com/vault/hp-and-amd-opteron-bed-fellows-at-last/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sniptools.com/vault/hp-and-amd-opteron-bed-fellows-at-last</link>
	<description>Design &#38; Technology Observations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amd operton</title>
		<link>http://sniptools.com/vault/hp-and-amd-opteron-bed-fellows-at-last/comment-page-1#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>amd operton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 05:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniptools.com/cms/?p=70#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>Well net server I&#039;ll buy will be opteron.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well net server I&#8217;ll buy will be opteron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinegar</title>
		<link>http://sniptools.com/vault/hp-and-amd-opteron-bed-fellows-at-last/comment-page-1#comment-1801</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 03:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniptools.com/cms/?p=70#comment-1801</guid>
		<description>No sooner than a 64 bit chip was announced than a whole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/02/18/HNvendor64bit_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bandwagon of services popped up&lt;/a&gt;! Intel meanwhile has a &lt;a href=&quot;http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-985156.html?tag=nl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;whole bunch of rollouts up its sleeve&lt;/a&gt;!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No sooner than a 64 bit chip was announced than a whole <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/02/18/HNvendor64bit_1.html" rel="nofollow">bandwagon of services popped up</a>! Intel meanwhile has a <a href="http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-985156.html?tag=nl" rel="nofollow">whole bunch of rollouts up its sleeve</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sniptools</title>
		<link>http://sniptools.com/vault/hp-and-amd-opteron-bed-fellows-at-last/comment-page-1#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>sniptools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniptools.com/cms/?p=70#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://snipurl.com/4kjt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://snipurl.com/4kjt&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right.<br />
<a href="http://snipurl.com/4kjt" rel="nofollow">http://snipurl.com/4kjt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manic</title>
		<link>http://sniptools.com/vault/hp-and-amd-opteron-bed-fellows-at-last/comment-page-1#comment-1799</link>
		<dc:creator>manic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2004 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sniptools.com/cms/?p=70#comment-1799</guid>
		<description>nice, but intel cannot be far behind,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=878009366&amp;fp=2&amp;fpid=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=878009366&amp;fp=2&amp;fpid=1&lt;/a&gt;

preview:
Intel plans to demonstrate a processor with 64-bit extensions during the upcoming Intel Developer Forum, confirming speculation that the company would respond to the processors unveiled by rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) last year, according to sources familiar with Intel&#039;s plans.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice, but intel cannot be far behind,<br />
<a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=878009366&#038;fp=2&#038;fpid=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.arnnet.com.au/index.php?id=878009366&#038;fp=2&#038;fpid=1</a></p>
<p>preview:<br />
Intel plans to demonstrate a processor with 64-bit extensions during the upcoming Intel Developer Forum, confirming speculation that the company would respond to the processors unveiled by rival Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) last year, according to sources familiar with Intel&#8217;s plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
